EXPERTISE

Matthew practises in criminal law and the complementary areas of financial crime, regulatory proceedings, private prosecutions, licensing and court martial. Since he started practising Matthew has rapidly earned a reputation for building solid client rapport and delivering excellent results.   

Matthew joined Trinity Chambers in summer 2022 having previously practised exclusively in London.

General Crime

Matthew has a busy defence and prosecution practice in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Court. He has experience across a range of offences including: fraud, proceeds of crime, firearms, drugs, violence, motoring and sexual offences. Matthew has experience as both prosecution and defence counsel in a variety of single and multi-defendant Crown Court trials.

Matthew has handled demanding cases involving considerations as to dangerousness, fitness to plead and mental health and young and vulnerable witnesses. Matthew has experience in dealing with Criminal Behaviour Orders, Sexual Harm Prevention Orders, and Proceeds of Crime related proceedings and associated orders. As a CPS Grade two prosecutor Matthew frequently advises on issues relating to disclosure.

Financial & White-Collar Crime: Defence

Having previously worked in the front office of a tier-1 US Investment bank, in an FCA registered position, Matthew is positioned well to advance his financial and white-collar criminal practice. He was recently instructed by a band 1 US white-collar law firm on a large scale multi-jurisdictional and multi-enforcement agency internal investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption. Matthew has also been instructed to assist a multi-national law firm defending two company executives accused of fraud, following the insolvency of a multi-billion dollar publicly listed healthcare company.

Financial & White-Collar Crime: Prosecution

Matthew has prosecution experience of financial criminal investigations through previous instructions for the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Matthew spent over 24 months working for the SFO advising on disclosure, relevance and LPP on a fraud and money laundering case in the energy sector.

Regulatory & Inquiry Work

As a Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC) Case Presenter, Matthew has experience of presenting cases relating to interim measures and substantive order reviews.

Matthew has recently received instructions through the Government Legal Department on the Covid-19 public inquiry.

Private Prosecutions

Matthew has acted on behalf of local authorities prosecuting individuals for fraud and trademark breaches and well as breaches under consumer regulations.

Matthew also has experience in representing private clients in cases involving local authorities and prosecutions brought under the Housing Act 2004.

Court Martial

Prior to being called to the Bar, Matthew served as an army infantry officer for over 5 years up to the rank of Captain; leading combat troops on overseas deployments, including multiple active operational tours. Aside from tactical command, he was also involved in overseeing soldiers engaged with internal disciplinary procedures, gaining an early insight into military justice, often attending court martial as an Assisting Officer. Matthew is therefore well placed to both understand military systems and quickly build quality client relationships with servicemen and women.

Firearms & Firearms Licensing

Matthew maintains a keen interest in firearms law, utilising his understanding of firearms from his time in military, as well as a personal interest as a licensed holder. Matthew appreciates that firearms law is often a challenging area of practice and enjoys bringing his knowledge and expertise to bear to deliver solid and well-reasoned advice and advocacy.

In addition to firearms within a general criminal context, Matthew has a developing practice representing private clients at the Crown Court appealing police decisions relating to their certification and licensing.

APPOINTMENTS

  • CPS Panel (Grade 2)
  • NMC Case Presenter
  • ICCA “Advocacy and the Vulnerable Training Programme”
  • AG Civil “Junior Junior” Panel

EDUCATION & AWARDS

  • University of Manchester, Politics & History – 1st Class BA (Hons)
  • Royal Military Academy Sandhurst
  • CFA (UK), Investment Management Certificate
  • BPP University, GDL – Commendation
  • University of Law, BPTC – Very Competent
  • BPTC James Crouch Scholar (Gray’s Inn)
  • Internship Award (Gray’s Inn)

MEMBERSHIPS

  • Grayʼs Inn
  • Criminal Bar Association
  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Matthew is public access qualified and is able to accept instructions from the public or businesses directly.

Following his move back home to the North East, Matthew maintains a London door tenancy at 9BR Chambers in London.

Clerking team

Liam Gorman

Lead Criminal & Regulatory Clerk

|
0191 245 9521

Criminal & Regulatory Clerk

|
0191 245 9542

Criminal Clerk

|
0191 245 9550

Clerk (Middlesbrough)

|
01642 247 569

Direct Access Clerk

|
01642 247 569

Lead Civil Clerk

|
0191 245 9589
  • "I trust him to offer sound advice and build excellent rapport with clients."

    Instructing solicitor

  • "Matthew is confident, clear and concise...he is the sort of barrister judges welcome having before them, which can only be to the advantage of his clients."

    Senior Circuit Judge

  • "Matthew was well presented, knowledgeable and made me feel at ease throughout it all."

    Lay client

  • "Matt dealt with us all with such professionalism and empathy. I honestly can’t thank him enough for all that he has done."

    Lay client

Prosecution counsel. Secured a conspiracy to burgle conviction after trial. Well organised group burglaries of multiple high-value residential properties throughout Surrey, Hampshire and Sussex. Trial involved adducing extensive cell site, mobile phone and ANPR data. Guildford Crown Court.  

Robbery and attempted robbery sentence. Despite a sentencing categorisation with a start point of 4 years (range 3 – 6 years), alongside multiple aggravating factors, HHJ was persuaded to sentence significantly below the sentencing range, imposing a 2-year suspended sentence. Sentencing involved demanding issues relating to mental health and advice on vacating plea. Mitigation advocacy was described by HHJ as “really able”. Lewes Crown Court.

Plea and basis to handling stolen goods accepted on day one of domestic burglary and theft trial. Potential third strike domestic burglary sentence avoided. HHJ persuaded to sentence 20 months in custody. Wolverhampton Crown Court.

Five handed class B drugs production sentence. Basis accepted that the offending was lesser “gardener” role, despite evidence indicating potential for significant role. Client sentenced to 10 months. Norwich Crown Court.

Appeal to the Crown Court. Instructed as Prosecution Counsel, successfully resisted a defence appeal against conviction for using a mobile phone whilst driving. Isleworth Crown Court.

PWITS class B sentence. HHJ persuaded to sentence at bottom of SCGs to a 6-month SSO with no conditions, despite falling as significant role cat 3 on SCGs. Guildford Crown Court.

Special reasons hearing and sentence. Judge persuaded to sentence well below the SCGs to 5 penalty points and a £500 fine for driving 108 mph on a 60-mph road. Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court.

Mitigation for an aggravated burglary and two s20 GBH counts.  Involved consideration and advice on complex basis of plea. PSR ordered to consider dangerousness. Offending fell at the top of the SCGs. Successfully avoided finding of dangerousness and a sentence below the top category SCGs start point. Sentence of 7 years 6 months. Inner London Crown Court.

Handling stolen goods trial. Cross examination of an officer on a voire dire, during trial, after Matthew identified continuity of evidence errors. Crown forced to offer no evidence after application to adjourn successfully opposed in light of previously unidentified evidence handling errors. Romford Youth Court.

Prosecution conviction secured in transphobic assault and criminal damage trial. Trial involved adducing evidence of multiple young and vulnerable witnesses and cross examination of young defendant. Special measures in place throughout. Maidstone Magistrates’ Court.

Stalking and breach of non-molestation order trial. Acquittal obtained on breach of non-molestation order after gaps in Crown’s evidence exposed during cross examination. Croydon Magistrates’ Court.

Loading...