EXPERTISE

Paul is a busy and versatile member of the Business and Property team, regularly appearing in the High Court and County Court. His sharp and pragmatic approach coupled with his skilled advocacy has given Paul a practice beyond his year of call. Paul’s intellectual ability and efficient way of working allows him to quickly gain the expertise necessary to advise on more unusual issues of fact or law.

Business & Property

Paul advises on complex and high value disputes with an emphasis on commercial litigation. He is often instructed in multi-million, multi-party litigation both as sole counsel and as a junior. Paul has a particular interest in civil fraud, including bribery, conspiracy and deceit, and has recently spoken at seminars on such topics as a result of the significant experience he has gained in those areas.

Paul’s practice also encompasses company litigation, including director, shareholder and partnership disputes. He has advised and acted in unfair prejudice petitions, derivative actions and breach of fiduciary duty claims. 

His work often has an injunctive element, and he is used to acting in urgent interim applications in the High Court. For example, Paul has recently been instructed in the High Court on freezing injunctions, quia timet and springboard injunctions and ancillary disclosure orders, both applying for and defending such applications.

Paul’s broader practice also includes a mixture of traditional chancery and property work. He is regularly instructed in a variety of commercial property, trusts, easement and landlord and tenant disputes. 

Employment

Paul acts for both claimants and respondents in all aspects of employment law, including wrongful and unfair dismissal, discrimination and TUPE claims. He frequently appears in multi-day trials in both England and Scotland and is instructed to draft pleadings and provide written advice. Paul is able to draw on his Business and Property practice when dealing with contractual issues in the employment tribunal and draws on his employment practice on discrimination claims in the civil jurisdiction.

Sports Law

Paul is a member of the FA's National Serious Case Panel and adjudicates on all types of serious disciplinary cases within grassroots football. Paul represents football clubs, rugby clubs and other sports clubs in commercial litigation, regulatory and disciplinary matters, including before the FA. Paul is a member of the British Association for Sport and Law.

Insolvency

Paul is regularly instructed in a wide range of matters of individual and corporate insolvency for both creditors and debtors. He often deals with winding up and bankruptcy petitions, applications to set aside statutory demands and urgent injunctions to prevent the presentation of a winding up petition. Paul can advise on all aspects of insolvency, having recently advised on an ultimately successful application to make a distribution to unsecured creditors in the course of an administration.

Mediation

Paul is a Civil Mediation Council (CMC) Registered Mediator who can lend his experience from his practice to a variety of disputes, large or small. Paul is versatile and flexible in his approach to mediation, able to facilitate conversations and offer perspectives for the most complex and difficult mediations. Trinity Chambers also has the facilities to host mediations.
Mediator Complaints Procedure

APPOINTMENTS

  • Civil Mediation Council (CMC) Registered Mediator
  • FA's National Serious Case Panel

MEMBERSHIPS

  • North Eastern Circuit
  • The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
  • Civil Mediation Council
  • Northern Business and Property Bar Association (NBPBA)
  • Employment Law Bar Association (ELBA)
  • Employment Lawyers Association (ELA)
  • British Association for Sport and Law (BASL)

EDUCATION

  • LLB Hons (2:1) Durham University – 2014-2017
  • BPTC (Very Competent) Northumbria University – 2017-2018

PUBLICATIONS

AWARDS

  • Harmsworth Scholarship – The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
  • Dean's Award Scholarship – Northumbria Law School
  • Chrystal Macmillan Prize – The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Paul is qualified to receive instructions direct from businesses, professionals and members of the public in appropriate cases.

   

Clerking team

Steve Walker

Lead Business & Property Clerk

|
0191 245 9589

Business & Property Clerk

|
0191 245 9556

Lead Employment Clerk

|
0113 3235 955

Lead Housing, Personal Injury & Public Law Clerk

|
0113 3235 955

Employment Clerk

|
0191 3009 359

Housing, Personal Injury & Public Law Clerk

|
0191 245 9543

Criminal & Family Clerk

|
01642 247 569
  • "Paul is an excellent communicator, who assimilates information quickly and thoroughly and then provides clear and robust advice"

    Commercial Litigation, Legal 500 2025

  • "knowledge of the law in this area is exemplary"

    Commercial Litigation, Legal 500 2025

  • Beyond Housing Ltd v Canvas Homes Tees Barrage Ltd (2025) - Junior counsel in an expedited trial in the TCC over 5 days. The Claimant was seeking a declaration that a second tranche payment of £3.6m in an £18m housing development was not due under the contract between the parties and sought injunctive relief preventing the Defendant from terminating the contract.

  • Lucion Group Ltd and another v Cooper and another (2024) - Appeared for the Second Defendant in the Circuit Commercial Court in an application for interim injunctive relief, directions and costs pending an expedited trial. Undertakings were given and accepted, and the matter was argued on costs only as to whether special factors were present justifying a departure from the usual reserved costs rule. Successfully argued that there were no special factors and costs ought to be reserved.

  • Khan v Mahal and others (2024) - Obtained a freezing injunction both at the interim hearing and at the return hearing, both opposed by the Respondent, in an unfair prejudice petition.

  • Waste Managed Ltd v Wilce and others [2023] EWHC 1456 (KB): Successfully represented the Second and Fifth Defendants in defending an interim injunction application in the KBD following allegations that the Defendants had misused certain confidential information of the Claimant to set up in competition.

  • Leicester Indoor Bowls and Social Club Ltd v Drax Energy Solutions Ltd (2023) - Represented the Claimant at trial in a bribery claim involving an energy broker and the Defendant, the energy supplier. One of the first ‘business energy claims’ that is being litigated in an emerging sector of litigation, currently stayed pending appeal.

  • Kerr v Scurr (2022): Represented the Applicant in a pre-action disclosure application pending an unfair prejudice petition, which was successful.

  • Copp v Simms (2022): Represented the Claimant in a possession claim where the Defendant argued a common intention constructive trust. The court found that neither party held the common intention that the beneficial interest in the property was to be held jointly and ordered possession.

  • Vickers v Vickers and Vickers (2022) – Represented the Claimant in a without notice application for a freezing injunction following a gift from a mother who allegedly lacked capacity to her sons. Obtained a freezing injunction against one son and a proprietary injunction against the other. On the return date, maintained the freezing injunction against one and obtained a freezing injunction against the other son who was previously subject to the proprietary injunction.

  • Shaw v The Leakey Nugget Ltd (2021) – Successfully represented the Claimant in a two-day multi-track breach of contract claim. Claimant was awarded 100% of damages and budgeted costs on account.

  • Heatley v Bashall-Brennan (2021) – Successfully represented the Respondent at both first instance and appeal in resisting an application to set aside a statutory demand of £280,000.

  • Re Transflex Vehicle Rental Ltd (in Admin) (2021) – Successfully represented Joint Administrators in an application for a distribution to unsecured creditors after a previously successful application to extend administration for 12 months.

  • Pringle v Community Integrated Care (2024): Represented the Respondent in an eight-day trial in which the Claimant was dismissed for refusing to wear a mask whilst working as a support worker caring for disabled residents of supported living. All claims were dismissed.

  • Ahmed v City of Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council (2022): Represented the Claimant in a six-day trial in the ET in respect of a complaint of victimisation where jurisdiction on limitation grounds was in issue.

  • Craig v Community Integrated Care (2022): Represented the Respondent in a four-day trial whereby complaints of disability discrimination were dismissed and, whilst the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded on the basis of a flawed appeals process, the compensatory award was reduced to nil as the tribunal found that, with a fair appeals process, “dismissal would certainly have been upheld”.

  • Groom v Maritime & Coastguard Agency (2022): Represented the Claimant at first instance in a two-day preliminary hearing in the ET to determine the employment status of Coastguard Rescue Officers and Station Officers. 

  • Armstrong v Altrad Services Limited (2021) – Represented Claimant in a five-day trial in the ET in his claim for automatic unfair dismissal under s.100(1)(a) and (b) ERA 1996. Successfully persuaded the tribunal that the Respondent deliberately engineered the Claimant’s dismissal over a six-month period. The tribunal further ordered the reinstatement of the Claimant.

  • Stewart v Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (2021) – Represented Claimant in a three-day trial for unfair and wrongful dismissal. Claim related to a nursing assistant who was dismissed for gross misconduct for performing a restraint on a patient in a mental health hospital who the Claimant felt was endangering a colleague. Unsuccessful on unfair dismissal claim but succeeded with wrongful dismissal claim, with the judge describing the Claimant’s actions as “noble”.

  • Porter v (1) Kingdom Services Group, (2) Coral Solutions Ltd and (3) aAFD Services Ltd (2021) – Represented the Claimant at a five-day trial in respect of complaints of automatically unfair dismissal after a TUPE transfer was fragmented and the Claimant did not transfer from the First Respondent to the Second and Third Respondents.

Loading...