Profile image of Simon Goldberg
Simon Goldberg
Call 1999
Specialisms: Chancery, Business, Employment
Simon Goldberg CV
Download as a PDF


Tel: 0191 232 1927


Simon Goldberg



"He is as sharp as a razor and able to take on and get to grips with matters of significant complexity very quickly."

Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chambers UK 2018

Simon is head of Chambers’ Business and Property team and is well established as one of the region’s leading commercial litigators. He regularly appears in the Chancery and Queen’s Bench divisions of the High Court, and in arbitrations, often with an international dimension.

Simon is one of only a handful of local practitioners to be recognised nationally by the professional directories as a leading barrister in Business and Property work, where his intellectual ability and willingness to fight his clients’ corner is regularly praised. He was a member of the Attorney General’s Regional Panel of Counsel between 2007 and 2018, which has given him the opportunity to advise and represent central government departments in cases of complexity and sensitivity.

Simon’s principle areas of practice include:

• Contractual disputes
• Commercial fraud
• Directors’ duties (including director’s disqualification proceedings)
• Shareholder disputes
• Contentious probate (including 1975 Act claims)
• Partnership
• Landlord & tenant (commercial and residential)
• Insolvency (corporate and personal)
• Professional negligence


Personal Management Solutions Ltd & others v Brake Brothers Ltd & others [2018] EWCA Civ 1635:(Related case below) Successfully represented the respondents at appeal to determine whether a claimant, who had successfully obtained a judgment on liability, could "expand" its claim on an assessment of damages.

Dybedal v Maskell [2017] EWCA Civ. 2399: Simon represented the successful respondents in an appeal against dismissal of a claim to a right of way, which received local and national press attention.

Personal Management Solutions Ltd & others v Brakes Brothers Ltd & others [2017] EWHC 383 (QB): Simon acted for the successful claimants in a claim for injunctive relief, specific performance and damages against a company and one of its directors which arose from the taking of a confidential customer list.

PTK v Implants International Ltd (2017): Simon acted for the Respondent in an international arbitration concerning a contractual dispute over supply of medical equipment to an Iranian company.

James Hay Pension Trustees v Macfarlane (2017, Ch. D.): Simon successfully resisted appeal against decision of County Court judge that a break clause in a commercial lease had not been validly exercised.

Thomas v Thomas (2017, Ch. D): claim by family members for a share of the family farm under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. The Claimants agreed to withdraw their claim following Simon’s cross examination of their principal witness.


Simon has for several years been recognised by the major directories as a leading junior in his principal practice areas. A selection of the most recent comments appear below:

"He is an impressive court performer, who is not bombastic and will go to the nth degree for his client." Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chambers UK 2018

"He is as sharp as a razor and able to take on and get to grips with matters of significant complexity very quickly." Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chambers UK 2018

"Very sharp and excellent on his feet, he is a master advocate. He knows the case law and CPR inside out and he is always exceptionally well prepared." Chancery, Chambers UK 2018

“He is very sharp and succinct in his advice, a strong advocate and a good negotiator with a good client manner - the calibre you would expect of London counsel." Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chambers UK 2017

"He's technically superb, gets all the issues, never misses the detail and comes back very quickly with good, sound advice." Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chambers UK 2017


"Simon is a strong advocate who quickly absorbs information and identifies the legal issues, readily highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each case."

Employment, Chambers UK 2018

Simon is usually instructed to advise and represent clients in employment disputes involving issues of significant factual or legal complexity and/or which are high value. Simon appears across the UK in the Employment Tribunal, the EAT and the High Court, often against Silks. He advises and represents employers and employees, and has over a number of years developed a particular expertise in employment litigation in the High Court. His principal practice areas include:

• Post termination restrictions
• Discrimination
• Equal pay
• Whistleblowing
• Trade Union rights
• Unfair dismissal
• Wrongful dismissal and breach of contract
• Post termination restrictions


Meikle v BEL Engineering Ltd (2017, ET): Simon successfully resisted a claim for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal against a prominent local employer arising out of a collective redundancy exercise.

Hooper v Hilco Capital Limited (2017, ET): Simon successfully represented an employee in a whistleblowing claim following a 5-day hearing involving complex legal issues concerning whether the claimant had made public interest disclosures.

Nattrass v South Tyneside MBC (2016, ET): Simon represented a teacher in his claim for age and disability discrimination, which settled following his cross examination of the employer’s principal witness.

Durham County Council v Hall (2015, EAT): Simon successfully resisted an appeal against an ET award of £1.5 million in his client’s favour.

Newcastle City Council v Khan & others [2014] All ER (D) 21 (Apr); Simon represented the local authority in an appeal arising from a large-scale restructuring and redundancy exercise undertaken by the Council.

Emmanuel v (1) City & Hackney PCT (2) Secretary of State for Health (2011); 6 week test case to determine national GMF defence in NHS equal pay claims; Simon led Richard Stubbs of Trinity Chambers for claimants against team of silks and juniors for respondents.

Cable Realisations Ltd v GMB Northern [2010] IRLR 42; Simon successfully represented the union in resisting an appeal concerning the transferor’s duty to inform under TUPE where there is no duty of mandatory consultation; explicit approval by the EAT of Millet J’s judgment in IPCS v Secretary of State for Defence.


"A real expert with real gravitas, he's extremely experienced and very personable." Employment, Chambers UK 2018

"Simon is a strong advocate who quickly absorbs information and identifies the legal issues, readily highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each case." Employment,
Chambers UK 2018

"Very knowledgeable on complex areas of employment law" Employment, Legal 500 2017


Recorder Crime & Civil (since 2018)
Attorney General’s Regional Panel of Counsel (2007 - 2018)


• North Eastern Circuit Commercial Bar Association
• Employment Law Bar Association
• Employment Law Association
• Bar Pro Bono Unit


Regularly lectures to students, solicitors and other professionals on all aspects of Business and Property litigation and employment law.


• BA in Jurisprudence: Trinity College, Oxford
• Queen Mother’s Scholar, Harmsworth Scholar and Exhibitioner, Middle Temple


Lives in Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne. Educated RGS Newcastle. Authorised to accept instructions under the Bar public access scheme